Berkeley Logo Human Resources, University of California, Berkeley

Site Map

·Home· About Us/
Contact
·Benefits· ·Careers· ·Compensation· ·Contracts· ·HRMS· Perf Mgt ·Policies· ·Resources· Staff Equity ·Training·

Workplace Success Stories - Best Practices 2003
Maximizing Employee Input in Managerial Decision-Making

Practice Name: Work Environment Survey
Department: Information Systems and Technology
Contact Person: Alice Mead, HR Manager
Phone: (510) 642-4651
Email: momcat@uclink.berkeley.edu
Web:
Dept/Unit Head: Jack McCredie, Associate Vice Chancellor
Control Unit: EVCP

Workplace Issue Addressed: Community building, communication & information sharing, planning, continuous improvement, accountability

Category: Organizational Improvement/Effectiveness


Description of the practice
Once every 2-4 years, employees in the eight departments within Information Systems and Technology (IS&T) have an opportunity to express their opinions in a confidential format on workplace issues, as they relate to their own departments and the larger organization of Information Systems and Technology. The Work Environment Survey is a tool IS&T uses to make the organization's management aware of specific areas where there are problems with operational practices, or with the quantity and quality of communications.

Benefits of adopting the practice
There is a greater sense of community, improved morale and greater awareness and accountability. There are more opportunities for discussions and projects that cross other departments.

How this practice works
A survey form (82 questions) is distributed to each career employee (approximately 350) with a stamped return envelope addressed to a tabulating service. The responder is not identified and each survey has equal weight. Results are tabulated and posted on the web for everyone to see.

What you need in place to replicate this practice
Budget to construct the survey, tabulate the results, and follow-up with training if required from an outside provider. Active support from top management.

Tangible improvements to the department as a result of adopting this practice
A vision statement was developed, as well as a forum for direct reports and directors, and an annual department-wide meeting where the director gives presentations and staff can submit questions ahead of time. Continuous cross-department groups meet with the director two hours weekly to discuss current activities. As a result of these surveys there is a greater sense of community, more opportunities for discussions and projects that cross other departments, and coherent planning across IS&T. There is greater awareness and accountability.

Why this practice was so successful and is worth replicating
Upper management support and a commitment to process improvement ensured that responsive follow-up action was taken.  Although the survey document was customized to address problem areas IST managers had identified, the topics and questions are relevant for a medium- or large-sized organization with multiple units that must work together to accomplish interrelated goals in a changing environment.